Why
Inquiry?
Inquiry-based learning approaches
when correctly implemented can help
develop higher-order, information
literacy and critical thinking
skills. They can also develop
problem-solving abilities and
develop skills for lifelong
learning. My experience has shown
this approach to engage and motivate
students. Students in my classes
worked co-operatively and
collaboratively to solve problems
and I found the depth of
understanding to be greater than
with other teaching approaches.
Teacher's Role
The
teacher's role in inquiry-based
learning is one of 'Guide on the
side' rather than 'Sage on the
stage". The teacher scaffolds
learning for students, gradually
removing the scaffolding as
students develop their skills. With
young children or students new to
inquiry it is usually necessary to
use a form of
guided
inquiry.
Questions
At the
heart of inquiry is a good question.
It is often open-ended (has no right
or wrong answer) and is
higher-order,
rich,
worthy and/or
fertile. Check out the
Question page
for more on this aspect.
Why
Inquiry?
In this
video clip which can be found on the
excellent
edtalks site I talk about
what inquiry-based learning means to
me.
Inquiry
Models
There
are a number of inquiry-based models such as
Eisenberg and Berkowitz's (2004)
‘Big6™'
and
Super3™
( a modified Big6™
for juniors),
Jamie McKenzie's (2000)
‘Research Cycle'
, Trevor
Bond's (2001)
‘SAUCE'
and Gwen
Gawith's Action Learning (1988), and
3 Doors to Infoliteracy® (2000).
Many of these were initially
developed as information literacy
models but fit well with
inquiry-based learning.
Problem and
project-based learning,
Mantle of the Expert,
curriculum
integration (Beane, 1997) and
communities of thinking (Harpaz &
Lefstein, 2000)
are other variations of
inquiry-based learning.
Many schools have developed their
own
models which are often based on
one or more of the existing models
but have been adapted to suit the
needs of the school and community.
As part of my e-fellows' research I
asked 23 New Zealand teachers which
inquiry models they had heard of and
which ones they were using. The
results are shown in Table 1.
|
Table 1. Models 23
teachers had heard of
and/or used |
|
Model |
Heard of |
Used |
|
Big 6™ |
61% |
26% |
|
Research Cycle |
48% |
13% |
|
Action Learning |
91% |
43% |
|
SAUCE |
65% |
30% |
|
Problem-based learning |
22% |
17% |
|
Own school model |
87% |
87% |
|
Other (various) |
26% |
22% |
For
more information on inquiry check
out these sites:
Recommended Reading
Beane, J. (1997). Curriculum
Integration. New York: Teachers
College Press.
Harpaz, Y. & Lefstein, A. (2000).
Communities of thinking.
Educational Leadership, 58(3),
54 - 57. Retrieved May 6, 2006 from
www.learningtolearn.sa.edu.au/Colleagues/files/links/Communities_of_Thinking_i_1.doc
Jan-Marie Kellow
2009
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
Photos must only be used for educational purposes
and must be attributed. Photos of children may only be used with my
permission.